Core Faculty Auxiliary Faculty Graduate Students Staff


claudiageist

Claudia Geist

Assistant Professor

431 BEH S
(801) 581-8029
claudia.geist@soc.utah.edu

VITAE



EDUCATION

2008    Ph.D. in Sociology, Indiana University
2001    M.A. in Sociology, Indiana University
1998    Vordiplom in Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Germany



RESEARCH INTERESTS

Research Overview

My research lies at the intersection of comparative social stratification, family, and gender. My goal is to understand the theoretical connections between gendered family institutions, policy, and social and cultural context. Among other things, my research has focused on the domestic division of labor in comparative perspective, as well as the context and the gendered labor market consequences of marriage cross-nationally. In collaborative projects I have examined the link between family status, the life course and geographic mobility in the United States, and attitudes towards and the social construction of gender and family in the United States and Germany.

Selected Publications

In Press   Geist, Claudia. “Gendered Views of Domestic Labor: Cross-National Variation in Men's and Women's' Reports of Housework.” in Treas, J. and S. Drobnič (Eds.). Dividing the Domestic: Women, Men and Housework in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

2009   Geist, Claudia. “One Germany, Two Worlds of Housework? Examining Employed Single and Partnered Women in the Decade after Unification.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40(3): 415-437.

2008    Geist, Claudia and Patricia A. McManus. “Geographic Mobility over the Life Course: Motivations and Implications.” Population, Space, and Place 14(4): 283-303.

2008    Lively, Kathryn J., Brian Powell, Claudia Geist, and Lala Carr Steelman. “Equity among Intimates.” in Karen Hegtvedt and Jody Clay-Warner (Eds.) Advances in Group Processes25: 87-115.

2005     Geist, Claudia. “The Welfare State and the Home: Regime Differences in the Domestic Division of Labor.” European Sociological Review 21(1):23-41.